GEO vs SEO: how to be found by LLMs
For 25 years we optimized for one engine. Now there are two worlds: the click world (SEO) and the citation world (GEO — Generative Engine Optimization).
What changed
When a user asks ChatGPT "what's the best X company in Portugal?", the model doesn't return 10 blue links. It returns an answer with 2 or 3 brands mentioned. If you're not there, you don't exist.
How LLMs choose
- Sources frequently cited in quality content
- Clear structure: headings, lists, concrete data
- Direct language, no marketing fluff
- Consistent presence across multiple authoritative sites
Practical tactics
- Content with verifiable facts — numbers, dates, comparisons
- FAQ schemas in JSON-LD for questions that matter
- Mentions off your site — guest posts, podcasts, directories
- llms.txt — yes it's a new thing, and yes you should have one
Where SEO and GEO meet
Technical quality still rules: speed, semantic HTML, internal links. The difference is what you write. SEO rewards keywords. GEO rewards factual clarity.
What to measure
- LLM citations (Perplexity has its own analytics)
- Referral traffic from chat.openai.com and perplexity.ai
- Mentions in Google AI Overviews
Ignoring GEO in 2026 will look like ignoring SEO in 2002.

Writes about applied AI, operations, GEO/SEO and how to turn companies into machines that keep running even when no one is watching.
